|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
nulab jones
Assisted Genocide
|
Posted - 2011.03.25 23:59:00 -
[1]
so let me get the right.
Less chance of sanctums = less people in 0.0, except in the case of -1.0 system where there are more people?
Sounds like less chance of people moving from gate to gate to resupply ammo, moveingloot or new ships, but more people in a handful of systems connected by JB's.
UM FFS even less chance of finding a roaming target for solo or small gang PVP and more chance of finding a frikking giant blob since all the people are focused into a singular system.
Say good be to Black ops since the majority of players will all be on a few systems, i'm not jumping a faction fitted Black ops BS in there with 45 ppl active and running sites, however it was fun when there where 5 in a random system.
Yay for CCP once again making the only way to play eve is the giant BLOB/Alliance
|
nulab jones
Assisted Genocide
|
Posted - 2011.03.29 01:31:00 -
[2]
Edited by: nulab jones on 29/03/2011 01:35:22 Seems like a ploy to sell more gtc and plex by making it harder to make the isk to fund pvp.
You seem to forget we need the isk to buy the plex, cos im sure as hell not using real money to buy a haircut, tattoo, new shirt or even pay for game time (did that for 3 years, so more more of my real money for CCP) in the future.
4 accounts paid with plex from running sanctums in a crappy system (cant afford the rent on a good one), maybe 1 or 2 after this change.
Well done CCP
|
nulab jones
Assisted Genocide
|
Posted - 2011.03.29 01:49:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Skaarl
way to be so chicken **** about this topic that you wait until after fanfare so you dont have to look your customers in the eye and tell them you are ****ing them.
Kinda funny they pushed this one through when our so called stake holder CSM is also in limbo and not active
|
nulab jones
Assisted Genocide
|
Posted - 2011.03.29 20:53:00 -
[4]
Edited by: nulab jones on 29/03/2011 20:54:13
Originally by: White Tree Should these changes go through, it will likely not stop larger Alliances from holding regions from which profit can be extracted via the moons. Especially if the profit is large enough to warrant keeping the space, which in the case of certain R64 types: it is.
We'll have to see how this works out.
Lol, lots of R64 in lowsec that all the main power blocks hold with 0 chance of a small guy getting near and no need for sov. I have no fear that you guys will have no issue raking billions per tech moon.
This is simply a attempt to sell more plex for ppl to fund there ships.
Sorry CCP I paid real money for your game for 3 years for 2 accounts, now i have 5 paid with plex and after this goes through will return to 2 again. Between the 2 plex to keep my TWO accounts going and some isk for pvp ships it's all I will be able to afford not having access to a -.9 - -1.0 system, but rather a -.47 system.
|
|
|
|